The major difference between Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut and Noctua NT-H1 thermal pastes is that Kryonaut has excellent thermal conductivity and low thermal resistance, making it a popular choice for high-end systems, while NT-H1 offers good performance at an affordable price point. The best choice will depend on specific needs and budget. There has been an …
Based on our tests with various thermal paste application patterns, the pentadot pattern resulted in the best heat reduction and spread. However, the temperature differences between the two methods were negligible, with the highest temperature reaching 76.5 degrees Celsius and the lowest temperature reaching 76 degrees Celsius. Coverage and moderation are the priorities when thinking …
The performance gap between the ARCTIC MX-4 and Noctua NT-H1 will become significant only if you are interested in overclocking. So, if you want an efficient thermal paste, then the Arctic MX-4 is a better option since it’s less expensive. But if you prioritize performance above anything else, then you’d want to buy the Noctua …
The Arctic MX-5 thermal paste is a non-reflective and non-conductive thermal paste that has demonstrated a 1°C temperature improvement over the Arctic MX-4 in testing. Additionally, the MX-5 is less dense, making it easier to clean up and separate the CPU and cooler during maintenance compared to the MX-4. While the MX-4 spreads and fills …
The Corsair TM30 and XTM50 thermal pastes are both good for cooling your CPU. But the XTM50 is a higher-end option that has better performance, is easier to use, and lasts longer. where the TM30 is a budget option. The decision between the two is based on your needs and budget. But if you want …
If you’re looking for a new thermal paste and can’t decide between the Arctic MX-2 and MX-4, that’s understandable because it’s difficult to pinpoint the significant difference between these two products (aside from the apparent price margin in favor of the MX-2). I had to buy 20 grams of each Arctic MX-2 and MX-4 thermal …
